MP Tanya Davis highly recommended everyone to read the following report.
（这位议员 Tanya Davis 在她的脸书上理性的建议大家广传下面的澳洲“Fair work commission“报告，关于强制打疫苗【相关阅读:显微镜学家发表对四家疫苗公司的成分分析】等等问题等，9月27日发布的。Final comment 是重点（如果你没有那么多的时间阅读）。
FAIR WORK COMMISSION
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm
DECISION（ released on 2021 Sept 27）
“[183] Australians should also vigorously oppose the ongoing censorship of any views that question the current policies regarding COVID. Science is no longer science if it a person is not allowed to question it.
FAIR WORK COMMISSION
DECISION
公平工作委员会
2021 Sept 27
决定（结论部分）（软件翻译的，不一定100% 准确。 懂英文的人建议去看这个报告如果您时间不多，建议读final comment 部分）
[179] Research in the context of COVID-19 has shown that many who are ‘vaccine-hesitant’ are well educated, work in the health care industry and have questions about how effective the vaccines are in stopping transmission, whether they are safe to take during pregnancy, or if they affect fertility. 37 A far safer and more democratic approach to addressing vaccine hesitancy, and therefore increasing voluntary vaccination uptake, lies in better education, addressing specific and often legitimate concerns that people may hold, and promoting genuine informed consent. It does not lie in censoring differing opinions or removing rights and civil liberties that are fundamental in a democratic nation. It certainly does not lie in the use of highly coercive, undemocratic and unethical mandates.
[179] 在COVID-19背景下的研究表明，许多“（关于是否打）疫苗犹豫不决”的人受过良好的教育，在卫生保健行业工作（的人） ，（他们）并对疫苗在阻止传播方面的有效性、在怀孕期间服用是否安全、或是否影响生育提出疑问。
37 . 要解决（是否打）疫苗犹豫问题，从而增加自愿接种疫苗【相关阅读:专家爆惊人内幕：接种疫苗，你有更大的可能会死于病毒】的人数，一个更安全、更民主的办法是加强教育，解决人们可能持有的具体的、往往是合理的关切（担忧），并促进真正的知情（知道疫苗的所有有利和副作用咨询）和同意（打疫苗）。它不在于去审查（对疫苗问题的）不同的意见，也不在于剥夺民主国家的基本权利和公民自由。它当然不在于使用高度强制性、不民主和不道德的授权（某个部分去强制人民打疫苗）。
[180] The statements by politicians that those who are not vaccinated are a threat to public health and should be “locked out of society” and denied the ability to work are not measures to protect public health. They are not about public health and not justified because they do not address the actual risk of COVID. These measures can only be about punishing those who choose not to be vaccinated. If the purpose of the PHOs is genuinely to reduce the spread of COVID, there is no basis for locking out people who do not have COVID, which is easily established by a rapid antigen test. Conversely, a vaccinated person who contracts COVID should be required to isolate until such time as they have recovered.
【180】政客们声称，那些不接种疫苗的人是对公共健康的威胁，应该“被社会拒之门外”，并剥夺他们的工作能力。这（种做法/说法）并不是保护公共健康的措施。 它们与公共卫生无关，也不合理。因为它们没有解决COVID – 19的实际风险。这些措施只能惩罚那些选择不接种疫苗的人。如果PHOs的目的真的是为了减少COVID的传播，那么就没有理由将没有感染COVID的人拒之门外，这一点很容易通过快速抗原检测确定。相反，感染了COVID-19的接种者应被要求隔离，直到他们康复。
[181] Blanket rules, such as mandating vaccinations for everyone across a whole profession or industry regardless of the actual risk, fail the tests of proportionality, necessity and reasonableness. It is more than the absolute minimum necessary to combat the crisis and cannot be justified on health grounds. It is a lazy and fundamentally flawed approach to risk management and should be soundly rejected by courts when challenged.
笼统的规定，例如强制要求所有职业或行业的人都接种疫苗，而不考虑实际风险，无法通过相称性、必要性和合理性的测试。这（种做法）超出了应对危机所必需的绝对最低限度，它不能从健康的角度提出理由。这是一种懒惰且存在根本性缺陷的风险管理方法。（当这种做法）在受到挑战时，法院应该断然拒绝。
[182] All Australians should vigorously oppose the introduction of a system of medical apartheid and segregation in Australia. It is an abhorrent concept and is morally and ethically wrong, and the anthesis of our democratic way of life and everything we value.
【182】所有澳大利亚人都应该大力反对在澳大利亚引入医疗隔离制度，这是一个令人憎恶的概念，在道德和伦理上都是错误的。我们民主的生活方式和我们所珍视的一切才是主题。
[183] Australians should also vigorously oppose the ongoing censorship of any views that question the current policies regarding COVID. Science is no longer science if it a person is not allowed to question it.
【183】澳大利亚人还应该大力反对目前对任何质疑当前有关COVID政策的观点（ 的人或是事情）去进行审查的做法。如果不允许人们去质疑，科学就不再是科学。
[184] Finally, all Australians, including those who hold or are suspected of holding “anti-vaccination sentiments”, are entitled to the protection of our laws,
including the protections afforded by the Fair Work Act. In this regard, one can only hope that the Majority Decision is recognised as an anomaly and not followed by others.
【184】最后，所有澳大利亚人，包括那些持有或被怀疑持有“反疫苗【相关阅读:纪录片：恐怖的疫苗真相之谜】情绪”的人，都有权受到我们法律的保护，包括《公平工作法》所提供的保护。在这方面，人们只能希望多数人的决定被认为是一种反常现象，而不是被其他人去遵循。
澳洲公平工作委员会官员官员强调：政府或企业雇主在工作场所或跨行业强制人们接种疫苗会在澳洲造成“医疗种族隔离”，这在“道德和伦理上是错误的”，也是“不公正的”。
公平工作委员会副主席迪恩（Lyndall Dean）：强制疫苗接种【相关阅读:专家爆惊人内幕：接种疫苗，你有更大的可能会死于病毒】 是“一个可憎的概念，与民主生活方式和我们的价值观正相反”。
迪恩对强制性疫苗接种提出了严厉的批评，并警告说，雇主和政府强制COVID疫苗接种会造成“医疗隔离”。
“强制接种是没有道理的”，“所有澳洲人都应该大力反对造成医疗种族隔离和社会隔离的制度。”
迪安：所有COVID疫苗仍然是临床试验的一部分，只是澳洲医疗用品管理局（TGA）批准临时使用而已。
“这不是阴谋论的一部分。这是一个很容易从TGA的网站上核实的事实。”
她说，临床试验中的同意要求不应该是有争议的，她提到了针对纳粹医生的实验而制定的纽伦堡法典。
公平工作委员会的另一位副主席海切尔 （Adam Hatcher）说：“胁迫与同意是完全不相容的”。
“如果一个人没有接种COVID疫苗，就剥夺其工作和参与社会的能力，这无疑将违反这一基本的、国际公认的人权。”
迪安说，研究表明，许多对疫苗持怀疑态度的人受过良好的教育，他们有合理的担忧。
“如强制整个职业或行业的每个人接种疫苗，而不管实际风险如何，既不必要也不合理。”
